Comparing 9 vendors in Post-Quantum Cryptography across 0 criteria.
The post-quantum cryptography (PQC) market quantum computing approaches practical implementation by the end of this decade, traditional asymmetric cryptography faces significant risks, prompting the need for quantum-safe alternatives. Many IT organizations remain unaware of the state of their cryptographic infrastructure, complicating this transition. The growing focus on post-quantum cryptography (PQC) mirrors the excitement around RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC). These widely used algorithms are now vulnerable to quantum attacks, with the “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later (HNDL)” threat posing particular concern for data that remains valuable over long periods.
1.1 Study Objectives
1.2 Market Definition
1.2.1 Inclusions and Exclusions
1.3 Market Scope
1.3.1 Market Segmentation
1.3.2 Years Considered
1.4 Currency Considered
1.5 Stakeholders
1.6 Summary of Changes
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Market Dynamics
2.2.1 Drivers
2.2.1.1 Integration of Innovative Cryptographic Algorithms
2.2.1.2 Hybrid PQC Mechanisms
2.2.1.3 Growing Awareness of Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
2.2.1.4 Driving Awareness toward Quantum Computing Threat
2.2.1.5 Rising Demand for Optimized PQC Implementations to Handle
Global Encryption Workloads
2.2.1.6 Collaboration between Academia, Industry, and Government on
PQC Adoption
2.2.2 Restraints
2.2.2.1 High Implementation Costs in Post-Quantum Cryptography
Market
2.2.2.2 Lack of Standardized Algorithms
2.2.3 Opportunities
2.2.3.1 PQC Integration in Blockchain Networks
2.2.3.2 Advancements in High-performance Computing Architecture
2.2.3.3 Early Development of New Products and Services to Provide
Competitive Edge
2.2.3.4 Government and Defense Contracts
2.2.3.5 Migration to Post-Quantum Cryptography
2.2.4 Challenges
2.2.4.1 Significantly Large Key Size and Implications on
Performance
2.2.4.2 Implementation Challenges
2.2.4.3 Lack of Skilled Workforce
2.2.4.4 Vulnerabilities Due to Advancements in Quantum Technology
2.3 Impact of Generative AI on Post-Quantum Cryptography Market
2.3.1 Top Use Cases and Market Potential
2.3.1.1 Key Use Cases
2.3.2 Impact of Gen AI on Interconnected and Adjacent Ecosystems
2.3.2.1 Quantum Computing
2.3.2.2 Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)
2.3.2.3 Hardware Security Modules (HSMs)
2.3.2.4 Cloud Security
2.3.2.5 Digital Signatures
2.3.2.6 Identity and Access Management (IAM)
2.4 Value Chain Analysis
2.4.1 Technology Infrastructure Providers
2.4.2 Post-Quantum Cryptography Providers
2.4.3 Application Developers
2.4.4 System Integrators
2.4.5 Verticals
2.5 Ecosystem Analysis
2.6 Porter’s Five Forces Model Analysis
2.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
2.6.2 Threat of Substitutes
2.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
2.6.4 Bargaining Power of Buyers
2.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
2.7 Technology Analysis
2.7.1 Key Technologies
2.7.1.1 Lattice-based Cryptography
2.7.1.2 Code-based Cryptography
2.7.1.3 Hash-based Cryptography
2.7.1.4 Multivariate Cryptography
2.7.1.5 Symmetric Key Quantum Resistance
2.7.1.6 Isogeny-based Cryptography
2.7.2 Complementary Technologies
2.7.2.1 Quantum-resistant Hardware Accelerators
2.7.2.2 Cloud-based Pqc
2.7.3 Adjacent Technologies
2.7.3.1 Quantum Computing
2.7.3.2 Post-Quantum Cybersecurity
2.8 Trends/Disruptions Impacting Customer Business
2.9 Key Conferences & Events
2.10 Business Model Analysis
2.10.1 Algorithm Development and Licensing in Post-Quantum
Cryptography
2.10.2 Consulting Services
2.10.3 Hardware Solutions
2.10.4 Software Solutions
2.10.5 Cloud-based Services Model
2.10.6 Specialized Security Solutions
2.10.7 Subscription-based Model
2.10.8 Education and Training in Post-Quantum Cryptography Market
2.11 Investment and Funding Scenario
2.12 Impact of US Tariff – Overview
2.12.1 Introduction
2.12.2 Key Tariff Rates
2.12.3 Price Impact Analysis
2.12.4 Impact on Country/Region
2.12.4.1 North America
2.12.4.1.1 United States
2.12.4.1.2 Canada
2.12.4.1.3 Mexico
2.12.4.2 Europe
2.12.4.2.1 Germany
2.12.4.2.2 France
2.12.4.2.3 United Kingdom
2.12.4.3 APAC
2.12.4.3.1 China
2.12.4.3.2 Japan
2.12.4.3.3 India
2.12.5 Industries
3.1 Key Player Strategies/Right to Win
3.2 Revenue Analysis
3.3 Market Share Analysis, 2024
3.4 Brand Comparison
3.5 Company Valuation and Financial Metrics
3.5.1 Company Valuation, 2025
3.5.2 Financial Metrics Using EV/EBITDA, 2025
3.6 Company Evaluation Matrix: Key Players, 2024
3.6.1 Stars
3.6.2 Emerging Leaders
3.6.3 Pervasive Players
3.6.4 Participants
3.6.5 Company Footprint: Key Players, 2024
3.6.5.1 Company Footprint
3.6.5.2 Solution Footprint
3.6.5.3 Vertical Footprint
3.6.5.4 Regional Footprint
4.1 IDEMIA
4.1.1 Business overview
4.1.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.1.3 Recent developments
4.2 NXP SEMICONDUCTORS
4.2.1 Business overview
4.2.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.2.3 Recent developments
4.3 THALES
4.3.1 Business overview
4.3.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.3.3 Recent developments
4.4 AWS
4.4.1 Business overview
4.4.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.4.3 Recent developments
4.5 PALO ALTO NETWORKS
4.5.1 Business overview
4.5.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.5.3 Recent developments
4.6 ST ENGINEERING
4.6.1 Business overview
4.6.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.6.3 Recent developments
4.7 DIGICERT
4.7.1 Business overview
4.7.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.7.3 Recent developments
4.8 IBM
4.8.1 Business overview
4.8.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.8.3 Recent developments
4.9 ENTRUST
4.9.1 Business overview
4.9.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
4.9.3 Recent developments